India's urban classification is a patchwork of definitions, from Census-based statutory and census towns to RBI's tiered system and the Ministry of Finance's city grading. This fragmented approach influences policy decisions, urban planning, and financial allocations. But are these varied hierarchies keeping pace with India’s rapid urbanization? The inconsistencies in classification continue to shape urban development and the push for a more cohesive, data-driven urban policy

Nagpur and Shimla may both be Tier-I cities, but that label tells us little about their unique challenges. India’s cities vary vastly in size, climate, and function. So urban diversity can’t be captured by population alone, but that’s how cities are often categorised. Could a better system help craft smarter policies? Rethinking city classification might just be the key to unlocking more effective urban planning.

Small cities in India are often seen as future big cities, but this mindset overlooks their unique challenges and rich heritage. Instead of imposing big-city solutions, why not let these cities thrive on their own terms? From historic cores to niche economies, small cities deserve tailored strategies that nurture their distinct identities. Could embracing local knowledge be the key to a sustainable urban future?